Posthumous Repugnancy
نویسندگان
چکیده
I argue that the possibility of posthumous harm ought to be rejected. My argument centers on a kind repugnancy case involving harm. Supposing existence harm, person whose wellbeing was extremely high while she alive could incur small harms over long enough period such it is true had life not worth living. respond various objections and in end conclude rejecting preferable all other options.
منابع مشابه
Posthumous reproduction and palliative care.
Posthumous reproduction is an issue fraught with legal, ethical, religious, and moral debate. The involvement of the hospice and palliative care community in this debate may be peripheral due to the fact that other health care professionals would be actually delivering the services. However, the hospice and palliative care community are more likely to treat patients considering posthumous repro...
متن کاملIs posthumous semen retrieval ethically permissible?
It is possible to retrieve viable sperm from a dying man or from a recently dead body. This sperm can be frozen for later use by his wife or partner to produce his genetic offspring. But the technical feasibility alone does not morally justify such an endeavour. Posthumous semen retrieval raises questions about consent, the respectful treatment of the dead body, and the welfare of the child to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1559-3061']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v22i3.1730